Find JSRs
Submit this Search


Ad Banner
 
 
 
 

JSRs: Java Specification Requests
JSR 384: JavaTM SE 18.9

Open Nominations

Nomination Type Full Name Biography Spec Lead Comments Submission date Spec Lead Vote PMO Vote


Approved Nominations

Nomination Type Full Name Biography Spec Lead Comments Submission date Spec Lead Vote PMO Vote
Expert Group Andrew Haley Andrew Haley is the Lead Engineer, Java Platform, at Red Hat, and the previous Red Hat representative for the Java SE Umbrella JSR. He is also a member of the OpenJDK Governing Board. 2018-01-04: Solicited EG member accepted. Jan 4, 2018 Y Y
Expert Group Tim Ellison Tim Ellison is a software engineer in the runtimes team at IBM UK. He has been working in the implementation of runtime technology for over 25 years, and has served the JCP on prior JSRs including Java SE platform specifications. 2017-12-03: Solicited EG member accepted. Dec 2, 2017 Y Y
Expert Group Simon Ritter Many years of Java involvement at Sun Microsystems from 1996 and then Oracle. Now at Azul continuing work on JVM related activities. Represented Azul on the EG for Java SE 9 and Java SE 10 (18.3). 2017-11-27: Solicited EG member accepted. Nov 22, 2017 Y Y
Expert Group Volker Simonis Volker Simonis works on Java VMs in the SAP JVM Technology group for more than 10 years. He is an OpenJDK contributor from the very beginning and helped the SAP JVM team engage in the OpenJDK project. He's the project lead of the OpenJDK PowerPC/AIX and s390x porting projects and a long term OpenJDK reviewer. He also represents SAP in the Executive Committee of the Java Community Process and served in the JSR 379 and JSR 383 Expert Groups. 2017-11-27: Solicited EG member accepted. Nov 22, 2017 Y Y
    Spec Lead Vote Legend:
    Spec
    Lead
    Vote
    Description
    -Not yet reviewed/pending - The Spec Lead has not processed this nomination
    PProcessing - The Spec Lead has seen the nomination and needs more time to arrive at a decision
    NNo - The Spec Lead has decided that this nominee should not be on the JSR
    YYes - The Spec Lead wants the nominee on the JSR

    PMO Vote Legend:
    PMO
    Vote
    Description
    -The PMO has not yet voted on this nomination
    PProcessing - The nominee can not yet participate on this JSR, but the legal agreements are being processed
    IIncomplete, Illegible, or Inaccurate nomination
    XAMissing required agreement to participate on this JSR - Addendum (ECA) Required
    XMMissing required agreement to participate on any JSR - Not a JCP Member
    XNot able to be on a JSR - The PMO has determined that this person cannot be on this JSR
    YYes - The PMO views this as a valid nomination with a current Membership in place