These are the final results of the JSR Review Ballot for JSR #233. The Executive Committee for SE/EE has approved this ballot.

JSR233

StageJSR Review Ballot

Ballot durationNov 4, 2003 to Nov 17, 2003

Votes

SE/EE

Apache Software Foundation

Apple Computer, Inc.

BEA Systems

Borland Software Corporation

Caldera Systems

Cisco Systems

Fujitsu Limited

Hewlett-Packard

IBM

Lea, Doug

Macromedia, Inc.

Nokia Networks

Oracle

Progress Software

SAP SE

Sun Microsystems, Inc.

Vote Log

SE/EE

On 2003-11-17 Nokia Networks voted Abstain with the following comment:
We believe that the issues that have been raised can be handled with proper scoping and further clarifications. Additionally, as this JSR has clearly a relation to JSR-232 it is essential that the scoping and co-operation model with these two JSRs is well defined. We see that the functionality proposed will have a role and consider therefore important that the questions raised get clarified. Therefore, we choose to abstain from voting instead of voting 'yes'. We are willing to participate in the further work in this area.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2003-11-17 IBM voted Abstain with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2003-11-15 Hewlett-Packard voted Abstain with the following comment:
HP shares the concerns of others regarding the relationship betwen this JSR and JSR 232
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2003-11-17 BEA Systems voted Abstain with the following comment:
BEA is also waiting for clarification regarding the relationship between JSR 232 and 233

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2003-11-17 Caldera Systems voted Abstain with the following comment:
SCO agrees with the reservations of others,
especially regarding the question of two EGs
(from different ECs) and one outside standards 
body all getting and staying in synch.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2003-11-17 Oracle voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2003-11-17 Fujitsu Limited voted Yes with the following comment:
Fujitsu thinks that it is necessary to clarify goals of both this JSR (J2EE) and JSR232 (J2ME), and find the way to harmonize each other.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2003-11-17 SAP SE voted Yes with the following comment:
SAP is reasonably satisfied with the explanation given by the Spec Lead regarding the overlap to JSR 232. We are still unsure about how exactly the J2EE industry will benefit from standardiziation in the proposed area, but given that JSR 233 will be an optional package agree that the Expert Group should be given the opportunity to demonstrate the future market potential. 
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2003-11-04 Sun Microsystems, Inc. voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2003-11-04 Borland Software Corporation voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2003-11-17 Cisco Systems voted Yes with the following comment:
Please make sure that 232 and 233 have some coherence and that they leverage each other. With best wishes to all
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2003-11-17 Apache Software Foundation voted Yes with the following comment:
Apache appreciates the efforts of both EC members driving for clarification, and the spec leads in supplying the clarification.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2003-11-17 Lea, Doug voted Yes with the following comment:
Thanks to the spec leads for the clarifications!
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2003-11-10 Macromedia, Inc. voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2003-11-10 Apple Computer, Inc. voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2003-11-11 Progress Software voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------