These are the final results of the JSR Review Ballot for JSR #250. The Executive Committee for SE/EE has approved this ballot.

JSR250

StageJSR Review Ballot

Ballot durationAug 17, 2004 to Aug 30, 2004

Votes

SE/EE

Apache Software Foundation

Apple Computer, Inc.

BEA Systems

Borland Software Corporation

Caldera Systems

Fujitsu Limited

Hewlett-Packard

IBM

Lea, Doug

Macromedia, Inc.

Nokia Networks

Oracle

Progress Software

SAP SE

Sun Microsystems, Inc.

Vote Log

SE/EE

On 2004-08-17 Sun Microsystems, Inc. voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2004-08-19 Lea, Doug voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2004-08-21 Nokia Networks voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2004-08-23 Macromedia, Inc. voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2004-08-23 Apache Software Foundation voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2004-08-23 Progress Software voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2004-08-26 Oracle voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2004-08-27 Caldera Systems voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2004-08-27 Borland Software Corporation voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2004-08-30 IBM voted Yes with the following comment:
In voting for this JSR, IBM would like to reinforce the comments in the JSR that its purpose is to eliminate redundancy and ensure consistency. This implies that the role of this JSR is to review annotations created by other JSRs to ensure a consistent style and lack of duplication, and adopt those annotations where possible. It would not be appropriate for this JSR to define detailed annotation semantics, since these are properly the domain of subject matter experts in other JSRs.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2004-08-30 Apple Computer, Inc. voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2004-08-30 SAP SE voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2004-08-30 Hewlett-Packard voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2004-08-30 Fujitsu Limited voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2004-08-30 BEA Systems voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------