These are the final results of the JSR Review Ballot for JSR #345. The Executive Committee for SE/EE has approved this ballot.

JSR345

StageJSR Review Ballot

Ballot durationApr 5, 2011 to Apr 18, 2011

Votes

SE/EE

Credit Suisse

Eclipse Foundation, Inc

Ericsson AB

Fujitsu Limited

Google Inc.

Hewlett-Packard

IBM

Intel Corp.

Keil, Werner

Oracle

Red Hat

SAP SE

VMware

Vote Log

SE/EE

On 2011-04-18 Hewlett-Packard voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2011-04-06 Oracle voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2011-04-08 Intel Corp. voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2011-04-12 Ericsson AB voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2011-04-06 SAP SE voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2011-04-14 Red Hat voted Yes with the following comment:
Red Hat's vote is based on the technical merits of this JSR and is not a vote on the licensing terms.  Red Hat would prefer a licensing model that creates an open arena for everyone, including those not members of the JCP and removes any ability for one individual or vendor to exert undue control over a standard. We are an open source company and hence would like to see such a licensing model for JCP contributions. Note however, that this comment is not necessarily directed at the license terms for this JSR, but is a statement of Red Hat's preferred licensing model.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2011-04-15 IBM voted Yes with the following comment:
IBM's vote is based on the technical merits of this JSR and is not a vote on the licensing terms.  IBM supports licensing models that create an open and level playing field by allowing third parties to create independent implementations of Java Specifications and that do not allow individuals or companies to exercise unnecessary control for proprietary advantage.  We support open source as a licensing model for contributions in the JCP, and would hope others will support this direction. This comment is not necessarily directed at the current business or license terms for this JSR, however, it is a statement of IBM's preferred licensing model.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2011-04-18 Credit Suisse voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2011-04-18 Fujitsu Limited voted No with the following comment:
Fujitsu is voting NO on this JSR because it considers the business terms unacceptable. 
This is not a vote against the technical content.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------