These are the final results of the Final Approval Ballot for JSR #348. The ECs have approved this ballot.

JSR348

StageFinal Approval Ballot

Ballot durationOct 4, 2011 to Oct 17, 2011

Votes

SE/EE

Credit Suisse

Eclipse Foundation, Inc

Ericsson AB

Fujitsu Limited

Goldman Sachs & Co.

Google Inc.

Hewlett-Packard

IBM

Intel Corp.

Keil, Werner

London Java Community

Oracle

Red Hat

SAP SE

SouJava

VMware

ME

Andreani, Stefano

Aplix Corporation

AT&T

Cable Television Laboratories, Inc

Deutsche Telekom AG

IBM

Nokia Corporation

Oracle

Research In Motion, LTD (RIM)

Samsung Electronics Corporation

Sheedy, Sean

Siemens AG

SK Telecom Co., Ltd.

Terrazas, Alex

TOTVS

Vodafone Group Services Limited

Vote Log

SE/EE

On 2011-10-05 Goldman Sachs & Co. voted Yes with the following comment:
Good progress and momentum on JSR.next series of JSRS's. Looking forward to additional progress.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2011-10-07 London Java Community voted Yes with the following comment:
Whilst there are still a number of important issues to discuss, we view this JSR as a vital first step (but not an end state) in the process of revitalising the community process.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2011-10-16 Google Inc. voted Abstain with the following comment:
Google abstains because it doesn't think this JSR addresses the real problems within the JCP.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2011-10-12 Intel Corp. voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2011-10-12 SAP SE voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2011-10-14 Eclipse Foundation, Inc voted Yes with the following comment:
There is much work still to do, but this JSR moves the JCP in the right direction.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2011-10-14 IBM voted Yes with the following comment:
IBM supports this JSR as part of the continuing evolution of the JCP.  We expect future JSRs to continue to evolve the JCP to increase openness, participation and adoption by the Java community to speed innovation for the developer community and our customers.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2011-10-16 Credit Suisse voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2011-10-16 Keil, Werner voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2011-10-17 Red Hat voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2011-10-17 Hewlett-Packard voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2011-10-17 Fujitsu Limited voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2011-10-06 Oracle voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2011-10-14 SouJava voted Yes with the following comment:
JSR-348 builds on the experience in openness that several existing JSRs pioneered, and makes open and transparent a mandate to the JCP as a whole. This is an important step to foster transparency and participation in the JCP. With this, the Java Community can have a much better participation in the follow up discussions around JCP.next, and we can now address the JCP's harder issues in a transparent, inclusive discussion.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2011-10-12 Ericsson AB voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ME

On 2011-10-05 Terrazas, Alex voted Yes with the following comment:
JSR 348 represents an important first step in reforming the JCP.   
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2011-10-06 Oracle voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2011-10-06 TOTVS voted Yes with the following comment:
We believe there was a clear and definitive upgrade on several fronts of the process with this new JSR. The JCP is certainly embracing openness and transparency. There is still much work ahead but this is a significant milestone.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2011-10-12 Cable Television Laboratories, Inc voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2011-10-14 IBM voted Yes with the following comment:
IBM supports this JSR as part of the continuing evolution of the JCP.  We expect future JSRs to continue to evolve the JCP to increase openness, participation and adoption by the Java community to speed innovation for the developer community and our customers.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2011-10-16 Siemens AG voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2011-10-17 Nokia Corporation voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2011-10-17 Vodafone Group Services Limited voted Abstain with the following comment:
We believe a more thorough set of radical changes aiming to fully democratise the process are needed for Java to become the moving technology in the mobile industry again. 

Unfortunately, the ambition for this JSR has been set much lower than we and a good share of the community would expect in that regard.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2011-10-06 Aplix Corporation voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2011-10-17 Sheedy, Sean voted No with the following comment:
I am opposed to passage of this JSR because

 spec leads can effectively withdraw JSRs without penalty
 license terms can be changed after someone has made a contribution
 the community has no recourse because the work is not community owned
* I believe the community expects and deserves more from the EC regarding Java's openness

The JCP was supposed to be the place where we could safely contribute our work.  Three years ago, one EC member led the call for the JCP to become a neutral organization so that no single member had control of it.  Last year, that member used its power to block Apache's implementation of SE 5 and prevent the community from using its own contributions.  JSR-348 does not correct this nor prevent it from recurring.

When considering which projects to work on, JCP members who value the tenets of the open source movement should not confuse transparency for openness.  They must look beyond the platitudes and judge for themselves whether their work is a contribution to a community, or benefits one member more than others.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2011-10-16 Deutsche Telekom AG voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2011-10-16 Andreani, Stefano voted Yes with the following comment:
JSR 348 is just the first step toward a renewed community process. My vote is Yes, conscious of the hard work still to do afterward.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2011-10-17 Research In Motion, LTD (RIM) voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------