These are the final results of the JSR Review Ballot for JSR #355. The ECs have approved this ballot.

JSR355

StageJSR Review Ballot

Ballot durationFeb 7, 2012 to Feb 20, 2012

Votes

SE/EE

Azul Systems, Inc.

Credit Suisse

Eclipse Foundation, Inc

Ericsson AB

Fujitsu Limited

Goldman Sachs & Co.

Google Inc.

Hewlett-Packard

IBM

Intel Corp.

London Java Community

Oracle

Red Hat

SAP SE

SouJava

Twitter, Inc.

ME

Andreani, Stefano

Aplix Corporation

Arm Limited

* AT&T

Cable Television Laboratories, Inc

Deutsche Telekom AG

IBM

Keil, Werner

Nokia Corporation

Oracle

Research In Motion, LTD (RIM)

* Samsung Electronics Corporation

Siemens AG

* SK Telecom Co., Ltd.

TOTVS

Vodafone Group Services Limited

* EC Member: Voting rights have been suspended according to JCP 2.8.

Vote Log

SE/EE

On 2012-02-08 Red Hat voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2012-02-08 Oracle voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2012-02-15 Google Inc. voted Abstain with the following comment:
Google abstains because it doesn't think this JSR addresses the real problems within the JCP.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2012-02-16 Credit Suisse voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2012-02-19 SouJava voted Yes with the following comment:
SouJava supports this JSR because we believe the single EC reflects the direction that the Java Platform should evolve.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2012-02-20 Eclipse Foundation, Inc voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2012-02-20 SAP SE voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2012-02-07 Goldman Sachs & Co. voted Yes with the following comment:
We are supportive of JSR 355. A unified EC reaffirms the focus on a cohesive JAVA platform.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2012-02-20 Fujitsu Limited voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2012-02-07 Intel Corp. voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2012-02-13 Hewlett-Packard voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2012-02-19 London Java Community voted Yes with the following comment:
The LJC strongly supports the goals of this JSR, but notes that some of the most important aspects of reform are still to be discussed in subsequent JSRs. However, this is a welcome step along the path of reform of the JCP.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2012-02-13 IBM voted Yes with the following comment:
IBM's vote is based on the technical merits of this JSR and is not a vote on the licensing terms.  IBM supports licensing models that create an open and level playing field by allowing third parties to create independent implementations of Java Specifications and that do not allow individuals or companies to exercise unnecessary control for proprietary advantage.  We support open source as a licensing model for contributions in the JCP, and would hope others will support this direction. This comment is not necessarily directed at the current business or license terms for this JSR, however, it is a statement of IBM's preferred licensing model.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2012-02-16 Ericsson AB voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ME

On 2012-02-07 TOTVS voted Yes with the following comment:
TOTVS supports a unified JCP Executive Committee in order to better steer, converge and advance the Java platform as a whole integrated set of standards.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2012-02-08 Oracle voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2012-02-08 Aplix Corporation voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2012-02-13 IBM voted Yes with the following comment:
IBM's vote is based on the technical merits of this JSR and is not a vote on the licensing terms.  IBM supports licensing models that create an open and level playing field by allowing third parties to create independent implementations of Java Specifications and that do not allow individuals or companies to exercise unnecessary control for proprietary advantage.  We support open source as a licensing model for contributions in the JCP, and would hope others will support this direction. This comment is not necessarily directed at the current business or license terms for this JSR, however, it is a statement of IBM's preferred licensing model.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2012-02-20 Nokia Corporation voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2012-02-20 Vodafone Group Services Limited voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2012-02-10 Deutsche Telekom AG voted Yes with the following comment:
We generaly support the merge and hope that the ME will be one day really equal part of the Java platform.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2012-02-12 Siemens AG voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------