The Java Community Process(SM) Program - JSRs: Java Specification Requests

Use of JCP site is subject to the JCP Terms of Use and the Oracle Privacy Policy

JSR #333
Content Repository API for Java Technology 2.1
Public Review Ballot
Ballot duration: 2013-07-02 to: 2013-07-08

These are the final results of the Public Review Ballot for JSR #333. The EC has approved this ballot.

Votes

Andreani, Stefano

* Aplix Corporation

Arm Limited

Azul Systems, Inc.

CloudBees

Credit Suisse

Eclipse Foundation, Inc

Ericsson AB

Fujitsu Limited

Gemalto M2M GmbH

Goldman Sachs & Co.

Google Inc.

Hewlett-Packard

IBM

Intel Corp.

Keil, Werner

London Java Community

Nokia Corporation

Oracle

Red Hat

SAP SE

SouJava

TOTVS

Twitter, Inc.

Icon Legend
Yes
No
Abstain
Not voted

* EC Member : Voting rights have been suspended according to JCP 2.8

View Vote Log

On 2013-07-03 SAP SE voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2013-07-08 Hewlett-Packard voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2013-07-08 Andreani, Stefano voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2013-07-02 Goldman Sachs & Co. voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2013-07-03 IBM voted Yes with the following comment:
IBM's vote is based on the technical merits of this JSR and is not a vote on the licensing terms.  IBM supports licensing models that create an open and level playing field by allowing third parties to create independent implementations of Java Specifications and that do not allow individuals or companies to exercise unnecessary control for proprietary advantage.  We support open source as a licensing model for contributions in the JCP, and would hope others will support this direction. This comment is not necessarily directed at the current business or license terms for this JSR, however, it is a statement of IBM's preferred licensing model.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2013-07-03 Eclipse Foundation, Inc voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2013-07-03 CloudBees voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2013-07-03 Arm Limited voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2013-07-03 Twitter, Inc. voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2013-07-03 Azul Systems, Inc. voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2013-07-04 Red Hat voted Yes with the following comment:
Red Hat's vote is based on the technical merits of this JSR and is not a vote on the licensing terms.  Red Hat would prefer a licensing model that creates an open arena for everyone, including those not members of the JCP and removes any ability for one individual or vendor to exert undue control over a standard. We are an open source company and hence would like to see such a licensing model for JCP contributions. Note however, that this comment is not necessarily directed at the license terms for this JSR, but is a statement of Red Hat's preferred licensing model.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2013-07-04 Gemalto M2M GmbH voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2013-07-05 Oracle voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2013-07-05 TOTVS voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2013-07-06 London Java Community voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2013-07-06 Google Inc. voted Abstain with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2013-07-07 Nokia Corporation voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2013-07-08 Ericsson AB voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2013-07-08 Keil, Werner voted Yes with the following comment:
As both EC and EG Member in that case, I vote "yes", trusting the Spec Lead will remove the additional non-Java "RI" before the final release into a separate project as discussed.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2013-07-08 Fujitsu Limited voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2013-07-08 SouJava voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------