These are the final results of the JSR Review Ballot for JSR #363. The EC has approved this ballot.

JSR363

StageJSR Review Ballot

Ballot durationMar 25, 2014 to Apr 7, 2014

Votes

EC

Arm Limited

Azul Systems, Inc.

CloudBees

Credit Suisse

Eclipse Foundation, Inc

Ericsson AB

Freescale Semiconductor

Fujitsu Limited

Gemalto M2M GmbH

Goldman Sachs & Co.

Hewlett-Packard

IBM

Intel Corp.

Keil, Werner

London Java Community

MoroccoJUG

Nokia Corporation

Oracle

Red Hat

SAP SE

Software AG

SouJava

TOTVS

Twitter, Inc.

V2COM

Vote Log

EC

On 2014-03-26 V2COM voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2014-04-03 Goldman Sachs & Co. voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2014-03-28 Red Hat voted Yes with the following comment:
Red Hat's vote is based on the technical merits of this JSR and is not a vote on the licensing terms.  Red Hat would prefer a licensing model that creates an open arena for everyone, including those not members of the JCP and removes any ability for one individual or vendor to exert undue control over a standard. We are an open source company and hence would like to see such a licensing model for JCP contributions. Note however, that this comment is not necessarily directed at the license terms for this JSR, but is a statement of Red Hat's preferred licensing model.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2014-04-02 Eclipse Foundation, Inc voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2014-04-07 London Java Community voted Yes with the following comment:
The LJC welcomes this JSR but strongly encourages the EG to define which platform is being targeted - CLDC or SE. With the active interest in potentially adding value types to SE 9, the EG should ensure that any work done here is not at odds with similar or related work happening elsewhere in the platform.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2014-04-07 IBM voted Yes with the following comment:
IBM's vote is based on the technical merits of this JSR and is not a vote on the licensing terms. IBM supports licensing models that create an open and level playing field by allowing third parties to create independent implementations of Java Specifications and that do not allow individuals or companies to exercise unnecessary control for proprietary advantage. We support open source as a licensing model for contributions in the JCP, and would hope others will support this direction. This comment is not necessarily directed at the current business or license terms for this JSR, however, it is a statement of IBM's preferred licensing model.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2014-04-07 Hewlett-Packard voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2014-04-07 TOTVS voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2014-04-07 Oracle voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2014-04-07 Twitter, Inc. voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2014-04-04 CloudBees voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2014-03-28 MoroccoJUG voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2014-04-02 Gemalto M2M GmbH voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2014-04-07 Credit Suisse voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2014-04-07 Intel Corp. voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2014-04-07 Azul Systems, Inc. voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2014-04-07 Fujitsu Limited voted Yes with the following comment:
Fujitsu's vote is based on the technical merits of this JSR and is not a vote on the licensing terms.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2014-04-07 SouJava voted Yes with the following comment:
SouJava agrees with LJC comments, and we also would like to see a better platform definition.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2014-04-05 Software AG voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2014-03-25 Nokia Corporation voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2014-03-28 SAP SE voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2014-04-03 Ericsson AB voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2014-03-26 Keil, Werner voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2014-03-26 Freescale Semiconductor voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------