The Java Community Process(SM) Program - JSRs: Java Specification Requests

Use of JCP site is subject to the JCP Terms of Use and the Oracle Privacy Policy

JSR #88
Java^TM EE Application Deployment
Community Draft Ballot
Ballot duration: 2001-11-06 to: 2001-11-12

These are the final results of the Community Draft Ballot for JSR #88. The Executive Committee for SE/EE has approved this ballot.

Votes

SE/EE

Accenture

Apache Software Foundation

Apple Computer, Inc.

BEA Systems

Borland Software Corporation

Caldera Systems

Cisco Systems

Compaq Computer Corporation

Fujitsu Limited

Hewlett-Packard

IBM

Lea, Doug

Oracle

Progress Software

Sun Microsystems, Inc.

WebGain

Icon Legend
Yes
No
Abstain
Not voted

View Vote Log

SE/EE

On 2001-11-12 Fujitsu Limited voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2001-11-12 Compaq Computer Corporation voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2001-11-12 BEA Systems voted Yes with the following comment:
BEA is sympathetic to the issues raised by Apache and votes YES to community review with the understanding that Apache's issues can be successfully resolved before final review.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2001-11-12 Borland Software Corporation voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2001-11-12 IBM voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2001-11-12 WebGain voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2001-11-12 Apache Software Foundation voted No with the following comment:
The Apache Software Foundation (ASF) finds the vague nature of the business terms for JSR 88 disturbing. We believe that no clear path to open source independent implementations of J2EE 1.4 components is shown by the statement of business terms, since they appear to be essentially unaltered from those of J2EE 1.3. Further, we believe that no clear path to J2EE compliance for such independent implementations is clear from the TCK licensing and terms of use.

Specifically, ASF would like Sun and the JSR 88 expert group to explain in detail how the proposed business terms for JSR 88 would allow solutions in the following examples:

1) the continuing lack of availability of a current and independent open source binary version of the JDK on FreeBSD, OpenBSD, and NetBSD
2) the licensing issues between Sun and Lutris concerning Lutris'  proposed open source licensing of their Enhydra project.

Unfortunately, without a far better understanding of the specific business terms which allow such solutions, ASF finds itself obligated to vote No on JSR 88. We cannot in good faith to our constituency, the open source community, approve carte blanche for the expert group with respect to these terms as stated.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2001-11-12 Progress Software voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2001-11-09 Oracle voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2001-11-08 Apple Computer, Inc. voted Abstain with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2001-11-08 Cisco Systems voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2001-11-06 Sun Microsystems, Inc. voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------