These are the final results of the Community Draft Ballot for JSR #116. The Executive Committee for SE/EE has not approved this ballot.

JSR116

StageCommunity Draft Ballot

Ballot durationDec 18, 2001 to Dec 24, 2001

Votes

SE/EE

Apache Software Foundation

Apple Computer, Inc.

BEA Systems

Borland Software Corporation

Caldera Systems

Cisco Systems

Compaq Computer Corporation

Fujitsu Limited

Hewlett-Packard

IBM

Lea, Doug

Macromedia, Inc.

Nokia Networks

Oracle

Progress Software

Sun Microsystems, Inc.

Vote Log

SE/EE

On 2001-12-25 Apache Software Foundation voted No with the following comment:
Apache votes no on the current business terms.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2001-12-24 Fujitsu Limited voted Abstain with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2001-12-24 Hewlett-Packard voted Abstain with the following comment:
HP abstains because we understand Dynamicsoft is looking into changing the proposed licensing terms based on EC member comments.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2001-12-24 Lea, Doug voted No with the following comment:
I cannot vote in favor of this unless or until business terms are clarified
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2001-12-24 Progress Software voted Abstain with the following comment:
We abstain due to our lack of knowlegde in the are and the discussion of the business terms.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2001-12-24 IBM voted Abstain with the following comment:
IBM are abstaining from voting for this JSR, as we do not believe that the proposed licensing terms will be acceptable to the community at large. We understand that Dynamicsoft are looking into modifying these terms before the JSR reaches Final stage.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2001-12-21 Sun Microsystems, Inc. voted Yes with the following comment:
We note that the issue of more direct reuse of the deployment and packaging format defined by JSR053 Java servlet specification is still open in this draft (open issue 14.1). We feel that the Java developer community would benefit from a more direct reuse of the established packaging and deployment model defined by JSR053, rather than defining a new-but-similar model. In particular the semantics of the SAR packaging format are all but the same as that of the existing WAR format, and much of the deployment information defined in the sip.xml defined in this draft could be more directly reused by reference from the existing Java servlet specification v.2.3.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2001-12-21 BEA Systems voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2001-12-19 Nokia Networks voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2001-12-18 Compaq Computer Corporation voted Yes with no comment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------