Reason: At the January 2016 meeting of the JCP Executive Committee (EC) the EC was informed that Oracle Legal had advised that no changes should be made to the JSPA or to JSR licensing models while litigation is ongoing (see the public minutes for more details).
Consequently the EC decided at the March meeting to withdraw (close) JSR 358. Another JSR ('JCP.next.5') will be opened to work on changes that can be implemented by modifying only the Process Document, and we hope and expect that we will be able to pick up the more substantive changes that were being considered for JSR 358 as soon as the litigation is completed.
Nominations
Open Nominations
| Nomination Type | Full Name | Biography | Spec Lead Comments | Submission Date | Spec Lead Vote | PMO Vote |
|---|
Spec Lead Vote Legend
| Spec Lead Vote | Description |
|---|---|
| - | Not yet reviewed/pending - The Spec Lead has not processed this nomination. |
| P | Processing - The Spec Lead has seen the nomination and needs more time to arrive at a decision. |
| N | No - The Spec Lead has decided that this nominee should not be on the JSR. |
| Y | Yes - The Spec Lead wants the nominee on the JSR. |
PMO Vote Legend
| PMO Vote | Description |
|---|---|
| - | The PMO has not yet voted on this nomination. |
| P | Processing - The nominee cannot yet participate on this JSR, but the legal agreements are being processed. |
| I | Incomplete, Illegible, or Inaccurate nomination. |
| XA | Missing required agreement to participate on this JSR - Addendum (ECA) Required. |
| XM | Missing required agreement to participate on any JSR - Not a JCP Member. |
| X | Not able to be on a JSR - The PMO has determined that this person cannot be on this JSR. |
| Y | Yes - The PMO views this as a valid nomination with a current Membership in place. |
