Find JSRs
Submit this Search


Ad Banner
 
 
 
 
JSRs: Java Specification Requests
JSR 383: Java™ SE 10 (18.3)

Open Nominations

Nomination Type Full Name Biography Spec Lead Comments Submission date Spec Lead Vote PMO Vote


Approved Nominations

Nomination Type Full Name Biography Spec Lead Comments Submission date Spec Lead Vote PMO Vote
Expert Group Simon Ritter I have been working with Java pretty much since the beginning, having joined Sun Microsystems in 1996. Having spent 8 years as a Java Technology Evangelist at Sun I moved to Oracle as part of the acquisition and continued to promote Java. Since joining Azul, I have helped represent them on the JCP EC and was on the EG for JSR 379, Java SE 9. Sep 22, 2017 Y Y
Expert Group Tim Ellison Tim Ellison is a software engineer in the runtimes team at IBM UK. He has been working in the implementation of runtime technology for over 25 years, and has served the JCP on prior JSRs including the Java 9 SE platform specification. Sep 22, 2017 Y Y
Expert Group Volker Simonis Volker Simonis works on Java VMs in the SAP JVM Technology group for more than 10 years. He is an OpenJDK contributor from the very beginning and helped the SAP JVM team engage in the OpenJDK project. He's the project lead of the OpenJDK PowerPC/AIX and s390x porting projects and a JDK 8/9 reviewer. He also represents SAP in the Executive Committee of the Java Community Process. Sep 22, 2017 Y Y
Expert Group Andrew Haley Andrew Haley is the Lead Engineer, Java Platform, at Red Hat, and the previous Red Hat representative for the Java SE Umbrella JSR. He is also a member of the OpenJDK Governing Board. Sep 21, 2017 Y Y


Processed Nominations

Nomination Type Full Name Biography Spec Lead Comments Submission date Spec Lead Vote PMO Vote
Expert Group Andrew Haley Andrew Haley is the Lead Engineer, Java Platform, at Red Hat, and the previous Red Hat representative for the Java SE Umbrella JSR. He is also a member of the OpenJDK Governing Board. Dec 14, 2017 - Y
    Spec Lead Vote Legend:
    Spec
    Lead
    Vote    		Description
    -Not yet reviewed/pending - The Spec Lead has not processed this nomination
    PProcessing - The Spec Lead has seen the nomination and needs more time to arrive at a decision
    NNo - The Spec Lead has decided that this nominee should not be on the JSR
    YYes - The Spec Lead wants the nominee on the JSR

    PMO Vote Legend:
    PMO
    Vote    		Description
    -The PMO has not yet voted on this nomination
    PProcessing - The nominee can not yet participate on this JSR, but the legal agreements are being processed
    IIncomplete, Illegible, or Inaccurate nomination
    XAMissing required agreement to participate on this JSR - Addendum (ECA) Required
    XMMissing required agreement to participate on any JSR - Not a JCP Member
    XNot able to be on a JSR - The PMO has determined that this person cannot be on this JSR
    YYes - The PMO views this as a valid nomination with a current Membership in place