Java Specification Request

JSR 392: JavaTM SE 17

JCP version2.11
JSPA version2.0

Nominations

Open Nominations

Nomination Type Full Name Biography Spec Lead Comments Submission Date Spec Lead Vote PMO Vote

Processed Nominations

Nomination Type Full Name Biography Spec Lead Comments Submission Date Spec Lead Vote PMO Vote
Expert Group Chandra Guntur Java developer since 1998, JUG Leader since 2004, Java Champion since 2019. Presented at several tech. conferences on Garbage Collection, JSR-292, Method & Var Handles, Time API, Streams, Futures, JDK/JVM comparisons etc. Maintain a blog and kata repository that teach the above features. Contributor to Eclipse Collections OSS Java library. Represent a large financial institution at the JCP EC, invested in the future of Java, specifically interested in JDK 17. Bio: https://github.com/c-guntur/c-guntur/blob/main/README.md After thinking it over I've decided not to accept your application. To keep the EG focused it is best to limit them to representatives of organizations that implement Java SE or build significant products on top of it, and to individuals with an established record of notable technical contributions. Being on the EG will not give you the influence you'd like. Technical decisions are made in OpenJDK release mailing lists (jdk-dev@ojn) and functional area lists. New features are also developed in forward-looking OpenJDK Projects such as Amber, Loom and Valhalla. Your time is best spent monitoring CSRs. An approved CSR is required for all API changes. Questioning the impact of a CSR before the change is pushed is much better than waiting for the promotion. I'll provide you with specific suggestions in a separate message. Finally, feedback to the EG via the java-se-spec-comments@ojn list is welcome. Feb 19, 2021 N Y

Spec Lead Vote Legend

Spec Lead Vote Description
-Not yet reviewed/pending - The Spec Lead has not processed this nomination.
PProcessing - The Spec Lead has seen the nomination and needs more time to arrive at a decision.
NNo - The Spec Lead has decided that this nominee should not be on the JSR.
YYes - The Spec Lead wants the nominee on the JSR.

PMO Vote Legend

PMO Vote Description
-The PMO has not yet voted on this nomination.
PProcessing - The nominee cannot yet participate on this JSR, but the legal agreements are being processed.
IIncomplete, Illegible, or Inaccurate nomination.
XAMissing required agreement to participate on this JSR - Addendum (ECA) Required.
XMMissing required agreement to participate on any JSR - Not a JCP Member.
XNot able to be on a JSR - The PMO has determined that this person cannot be on this JSR.
YYes - The PMO views this as a valid nomination with a current Membership in place.